If you’re new to Tracer or want a high-level mental model, see How Tracer fits in your stack.
Supported workflow orchestrators
The integrations below describe how Tracer works with common orchestration frameworks used in scientific, data, and bioinformatics pipelines. Each page focuses on the execution gaps specific to that tool.Tracer and Apache Airflow
What DAGs don’t show at runtimeTracer observes execution behavior inside Airflow tasks, including subprocesses and external tools.
Tracer and Dagster
Execution insight beneath assets and jobsTracer reveals how resources are consumed during execution of Dagster assets, ops, and jobs.
Tracer and Flyte
Execution insight beneath tasks and workflowsTracer shows how Flyte tasks actually behave at runtime, beyond task state and execution metadata.
Tracer and Prefect
Runtime visibility beneath flow stateTracer captures system-level behavior of Prefect tasks, including work performed outside Python.
Tracer and Seqera
Execution behavior inside Nextflow pipelinesTracer observes what happens inside Nextflow tasks at runtime, beyond scheduling and task state.
When Tracer is useful with orchestration tools
Tracer is most useful alongside workflow orchestrators when teams need to:- Understand why tasks run slower than expected
- Distinguish CPU-bound, I/O-bound, and idle execution
- Diagnose performance issues not visible in task logs
- Attribute resource usage and cost to specific workflows or runs
Where to go next
- How Tracer fits in your stack (conceptual overview)
- Individual integration pages (tool-specific execution gaps and observability comparisons)

